Make

Make (formerly Integromat) occupies the middle ground in the automation stack: more powerful than Zapier, more accessible than n8n. Its visual canvas lets you see the entire flow of data through a scenario at once — which modules run, which paths branch, where data is transformed — making it easier to build and debug complex workflows than Zapier's linear, step-by-step interface.

Want help building a Make scenario? Book a call →

What is Make?

Make is a cloud-based visual automation platform that connects apps through "scenarios" — flowchart-like diagrams where each node is a module (trigger, action, router, aggregator, or transformer). You drag modules onto a canvas, connect them, configure the data mappings between them, and activate the scenario. Make handles scheduling, retries, error routing, and execution history.

Target audience

Ops-minded business owners, marketing and revenue operations teams, technical non-developers, and anyone who has outgrown Zapier's pricing or hit limits on data transformation. Also strong for agencies building automations for multiple clients.

Core capabilities

• 1,000+ native app integrations including all major CRM, marketing, and productivity tools
• Visual scenario builder with routers, aggregators, iterators, and filters
• Advanced data transformation using Make's formula language
• Native HTTP/REST and JSON modules for connecting any API
• Error handling with dedicated error routes and retry logic
• Native modules for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI, and other AI providers

Why Make beats Zapier for complex workflows

Make's core advantage over Zapier is how it handles data. In Zapier, every step passes data forward linearly. In Make, you can aggregate data from multiple sources, iterate over arrays item by item, branch into parallel paths with a router, merge results, and transform data using built-in functions — all visible on the canvas at once.

Pricing is also significantly lower at scale. Make charges per operation (each module execution), and its Core plan provides 10,000 operations for USD $9/month. Zapier's equivalent task volume costs $49–$73/month. For businesses running high-volume automations, Make frequently pays for itself in cost savings versus Zapier alone.

According to Make's 2024 platform statistics, over 500,000 organizations use Make to run more than 150 million scenarios per month — a strong signal of production-grade reliability.

What does Make look like in practice?

A typical Make scenario for a client onboarding workflow:

The router allows conditional branching — for example, routing enterprise-size submissions to one path and SMB submissions to another, each with different follow-up logic. This is difficult in Zapier and natural in Make.

Make vs Zapier vs n8n

Where Make falls short

Make has fewer native integrations than Zapier — 1,000 vs 7,000. For businesses using less common or niche SaaS tools, Zapier may be the only option that has a pre-built connector. The HTTP module covers the gap in many cases, but it requires knowing the API you're connecting to.

Make is also cloud-only with no self-hosting option. For teams with data residency requirements or who want to keep automation infrastructure on-premise, n8n is the correct choice.

How Aurora Designs uses Make

Make is our go-to recommendation for clients who have validated automation with Zapier and are ready to handle more complex workflows, or who are running enough volume that Zapier's cost is becoming a concern. We build, document, and hand off Make scenarios with error notifications and a monitoring setup so your team knows immediately if something breaks.